![]() I think there are two possible solutions for this problem:Ī) I need to create a /etc/X11/nf file, but I do not know what I should specify in this file, ORī) Ubuntu needs to fix my problem by bugfixing the Ubuntu driver for my graphics card Radeon HD 4350 (this driver is or should be part of the Ubuntu packages "xserver-xorg-video-ati-Its-utopic" and/or "xserver-xorg-video-radeon-Its-utopic") , but nobody has answered to my request yet, since 7 days. in combination with the hardware that I use. ![]() I guess it should also appear in other Ubuntu variants of Ubuntu 14.02. ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 12.I think my problem is not limited to Ubuntu Studio 14.04.2. compiled for 1.12.4, module version = 0.4.1 (II) Module fbdev: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0) (II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 12.1 compiled for 1.12.4, module version = 7.3.0 (II) Module ati: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so (=) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout (=) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 2 (=) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 1 (=) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 0 (II) Module dri: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so compiled for 1.12.4, module version = 1.13.0 (II) Module record: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/librecord.so (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so (II) Loading extension XVideo-MotionCompensation (II) Module extmod: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libextmod.so compiled for 1.12.4, module version = 0.6.0 (II) Module glamoregl: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 6.0 compiled for 1.12.4, module version = 1.2.0 (II) Module dri2: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri2.so ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4 compiled for 1.12.4, module version = 1.0.0 (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfb.so This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. (II) "record" will be loaded by default. (II) "extmod" will be loaded by default. If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable AutoAddDevices. (II) The server relies on udev to provide the list of input devices. (=) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules" (=) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/" ![]() (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (?) unknown. (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, Markers: (-) probed, (**) from config file, (=) default setting, To make sure that you have the latest version. Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/syslinux/vmlinuz.A init=/sbin/init boot=local rootwait ro noresume noswap loglevel=3 quiet noinitrd console= i915.modeset=1 cros_efi cros_debug root=PARTUUID=42AFFED2-2858-3048-8308-6F282A600A5C Current Operating System: Linux localhost 4.4.14+ #1 SMP Wed Nov 9 04:50: x86_64 Build Operating System: Linux 3.13.0-91-generic x86_64 Gentoo Where do I begin to use my own drivers for specific hardware that doesn't work with generic? My question and hope is that someone can give me a guide of where to look to learn how to infuse my own drivers into a Chromium image to make it work on a device that doesn't work with the generic boards? I know there are resources out there I'm sure, but I've never been able to find something to lays it all out in a way that's understandable for me any way. However I did find a build from Neverware Cloudready that did have working graphics, etc so I know there are drivers out there that will work. However, I'm not in a situation where I have a device (HP Probook MT41) that I cannot get to work with any of the generic builds/boards. That all being said, I am very familiar with the Chromium OS Development process within the boundaries of using pre-config'd boards, etc. I am the director of technology at a public school district and this has been invaluable to use on some of our PC workstations. I have been working with the development version of Chromium for a while now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |